diskey river wrote:I think keeping age protected amateur fields makes sense, but I would like to see the Pro field split into 2 ratings based divisions like 970-1000 & 1000+. Just 2 divisions with money on the line.
Clue wrote:diskey river wrote:I think keeping age protected amateur fields makes sense, but I would like to see the Pro field split into 2 ratings based divisions like 970-1000 & 1000+. Just 2 divisions with money on the line.
So ams should be split by age, but pros should be split by ability? The divisions work at much larger tourmaments, but it doesn't make sense to split so many people up who shoot relatively the same at smaller tournaments. A pro2 division could work at an NT, but IMO the pro2 division already exists, it's called Adv. Either get better or accept that you're not a pro player. There's nothing worse than listening to people who want to play the top division but don't want to do the work to be competitive in it.
claring wrote:GDL17921 wrote:Here's some mensuration for you Clue - how far is it from Newton to Mt. Pleasant?
Furniss wrote:65 at newton and 52 at mount pleasant....117 people playing sanctioned events..would it have been that high with just one? I highly doubt it.
diskey river wrote:I know we don't know each other but if this is directed at me, you got me all wrong. I've already stated in this thread that since becoming competitive in Oct 2010 my rating has jumped 70 points and I play 25 ish sanctioned tournies a season. I drive all over the state and support everyone a little and I work 50-60 hours a week. How much more work am I supposed to put in that will enable me to "compete in the top division?"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests