So the official ratings for this are up and after rereading through the previous posts I kind of get a chuckle looking at how different the unofficial round ratings are compared to the official ratings.
If you have two pools who play the same layout but at different times under different conditions how do you possibly compare the rounds? I could really give two chucks less about losing the ratings points, my rating would be shit either way. But I really hope this averaging BS was not done because a few of the pros bitched about it. I'm all for trying to get more dollars in the pro purse but "fluffing" ratings is a joke.
Don't worry though, the St. Louis Open made the same mistake but it was even worse because the conditions were drastically different between rounds there. And their payout sucked major D compared to Kings Material Open. I'll always support Titan and love going into the shop but this seems strange. Please correct me if I'm off base.
Can't criticize our smile...